What should learn from iPhone Android

On Slate.com learn that, in the smartphone market, Apple has captured 14% of users with its iPhone, BlackBerry is so far ahead with 21% but Google Android still trailing by only 3% spread. And the error would be in having everything given carte blanche to the producers.

The problem, according to Slate.com, is that Google has no control over design and marketing of mobile Android, and this has fragmented the market, preventing that is the perception of a Google Phone by the public. So, who but a fan or a technician can determine what they have in common the G1 by T-Mobile and the myTouch 3G? Yet, the operating system that feeds them is the same.

Producer’s external devices do not have ambitions. None of them seems groped to match the capabilities of the iPhone, much less try to surprise us with features that greatly exceed those of the Apple device.

And altogether, let’s face it. Been for traditional producers, we would still before my eyes very advanced piece of technology, with an endless list of integrated technologies, but usability and user interface frills Amiga 500. The problem is not copying Apple, and not even builds a cell phone. Manufacturers have put into their heads that they need to think a service and build the best possible device around-which is exactly what Palm, BlackBerry and Apple have been able to do on occasions and with different outcomes.

The fortunes for Android could change if you had a browser better than Safari Mobile, a screen more generous, or controls more features than Apple, but is unlikely to happen. Producers Android, John Gruber says: If Apple is BMW, you try to be Porsche. Knows he does not give straight.

Leave a Reply